Start Free Trial
REFLECTIVE WRITING FOR NURSING STUDENTS

Gibbs vs Driscoll: which reflective model should you use?

Understand the difference between Gibbs' Reflective Cycle and Driscoll's What? So What? Now What? framework β€” and learn how each can help you move beyond description towards meaningful reflection on nursing practice.

Practical guidance for student nurses Β· Clear examples Β· Academic writing support
QUICK ANSWER

Both models help you reflect β€” but they organise your thinking differently.

01
Gibbs

More structured, with six stages that guide you through an experience in detail.

02
Driscoll

Simpler and more concise, built around three questions: What? So What? Now What?

START WITH THE PURPOSE

Reflective writing is more than describing what happened.

A strong nursing reflection should help you examine an experience, consider why it mattered, identify what you learned and decide how that learning may influence your future practice.

Reflective models give that thinking a structure. They do not do the reflection for you. Instead, they provide prompts that help you move from simply recounting an event towards analysing your learning and considering what you might do differently next time.

!
Before choosing a model

Always check your university module guidance, assessment brief and marking criteria. Some assignments specify a particular reflective model, while others allow you to choose.

GIBBS VS DRISCOLL

The difference at a glance.

Both frameworks encourage you to think about experience, meaning and future action. The main difference is the amount of structure they provide.

01
MORE STRUCTURED

Gibbs' Reflective Cycle

Gibbs breaks reflection into six distinct stages, making it useful when you need a clear framework to work through an experience systematically.

  1. Description
  2. Feelings
  3. Evaluation
  4. Analysis
  5. Conclusion
  6. Action Plan
Often useful when: you want detailed prompts or are still developing confidence with reflective writing.
02
MORE CONCISE

Driscoll's Reflective Framework

Driscoll organises reflection around three broad questions. It offers less scaffolding than Gibbs, but can help you produce a focused reflection without repeating yourself.

  1. What?
  2. So What?
  3. Now What?
Often useful when: you already understand reflective thinking and want a simpler, more flexible structure.
GIBBS' REFLECTIVE CYCLE

Six stages that guide you through the experience.

Gibbs' model is particularly useful when you want a clear sequence of questions to help organise your thinking.

The important point is not to give every stage exactly the same amount of writing. In many nursing assignments, the deeper learning happens in the evaluation, analysis and action-planning stages.

01

Description

What happened? Give enough context for the reader to understand the situation without turning the reflection into a long story.

02

Feelings

What were you thinking and feeling at the time? How might those responses have influenced what you did?

03

Evaluation

What went well? What did not go well? Which parts of the experience were effective or ineffective?

04

Analysis

Why did events unfold as they did? Connect the experience to nursing knowledge, communication, professional values, evidence or relevant theory.

05

Conclusion

What have you learned? What could you have done differently or what would you now understand more clearly?

06

Action Plan

If a similar situation happened again, what would you do? Identify specific development, learning or changes in practice.

DRISCOLL'S REFLECTIVE FRAMEWORK

Three questions that keep reflection focused.

Driscoll's framework can feel simpler because several reflective processes are grouped together under three broad headings.

01

What?

Establish what happened and identify the significant part of the experience.

  • What happened?
  • Who was involved?
  • What was your role?
  • What was the key issue?
02

So What?

Examine why the experience matters and what you learned from it.

  • Why was this significant?
  • What went well or poorly?
  • What knowledge helps explain it?
  • What did you learn?
03

Now What?

Turn reflection into future action and professional development.

  • What would you do differently?
  • What knowledge do you need?
  • What will you practise?
  • How will this influence future care?
WORKED NURSING EXAMPLE

One experience. Two possible structures.

Imagine you are a student nurse who notices that a patient appears more breathless than earlier in the shift. You are unsure whether the change is significant, but you raise your concern with your supervising registered nurse.

GIBBS

A six-stage route

Description: Briefly explain that you noticed increased breathlessness and escalated your concern to your supervising nurse.

Feelings: Consider your uncertainty and concern about whether you were interpreting the situation correctly.

Evaluation: Identify what went well, such as recognising a change and seeking support, and what was difficult, such as lacking confidence.

Analysis: Explore why recognising deterioration, communication and escalation matter. Link your discussion to relevant learning or evidence required by your assignment.

Conclusion: Identify what the experience taught you about observation, communication and asking for help.

Action Plan: Decide what you will revise, practise or discuss with your supervisor before a similar situation occurs again.

DRISCOLL

A three-question route

What? Explain that you noticed increased breathlessness and raised your concern with your supervising nurse.

So What? Examine why the change mattered, how you responded, what you understood about deterioration and why escalation was important. Consider your uncertainty and what you learned.

Now What? Explain how you will strengthen your knowledge, become more confident recognising changes in a patient's condition and use appropriate communication or escalation processes in future.

Notice the difference: the learning may be very similar. The framework mainly changes how that thinking is organised on the page.
SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON

Which model might suit you?

Question Gibbs Driscoll
Number of stages Six Three
Level of structure Highly structured Broad and flexible
Feelings explicitly prompted Yes Can be included within So What?
Evaluation and analysis Separated into stages Usually combined within So What?
Future action Action Plan Now What?
Helpful for new reflective writers Often very helpful Can require more independent thinking
STRONGER REFLECTIVE WRITING

Whichever model you use, avoid getting stuck in description.

A reflective framework gives you headings or questions. The quality of the reflection still depends on what you do underneath them.

01

Keep description proportionate

Give enough context to understand the experience, then move into evaluation, interpretation and learning.

02

Explain why things mattered

Do not simply state what happened. Explore why events, decisions, communication or responses were significant.

03

Connect experience to knowledge

Where your assessment requires it, connect the experience to appropriate evidence, professional guidance, theory or learning.

04

Finish with meaningful action

β€œI will improve next time” is too vague. Identify what you will learn, practise, discuss or change.

COMMON MISTAKES

Four traps to avoid.

Reflective writing becomes stronger when the framework supports your thinking rather than becoming a checklist that controls it.

Γ—
Writing a chronological story

Too much description leaves too little room for analysis and learning.

Γ—
Answering each stage mechanically

The headings should organise your thinking, not produce six disconnected mini-answers.

Γ—
Making unsupported claims

If your assignment expects academic evidence, use appropriate sources to support your analysis.

Γ—
Ending without future action

Reflection should help identify what you will carry forward into future learning or practice.

WHICH SHOULD I CHOOSE?

Start with your assignment β€” not your favourite model.

There is no universal rule that every nursing student should use Gibbs or that Driscoll is always better for shorter reflections. Your assessment requirements come first.

CHOOSE GIBBS WHEN...
  • You want clear prompts at each stage.
  • You are new to reflective writing.
  • Your assignment expects detailed exploration.
  • You find it difficult to move from experience to action.
CHOOSE DRISCOLL WHEN...
  • You prefer a simpler structure.
  • You can organise analysis more independently.
  • You want to avoid excessive repetition between stages.
  • Your assignment allows a flexible reflective framework.
βœ“
PROFESSIONAL REFLECTION

Protect confidentiality.

When reflecting on placement or clinical experiences, follow your university guidance and relevant professional requirements around confidentiality, privacy and anonymisation. Avoid including information that could unnecessarily identify patients, relatives, colleagues or organisations.

CONTINUE LEARNING WITH NURSENET

Build confidence with academic writing and nursing study.

Explore more NurseNet support for student nurses, including academic writing, placement learning, nursing numeracy and drug calculations.