Start Free Trial
Clinical Confidence β€’ Student Nurse Guide

Understanding Glasgow Coma Scale for Student Nurses

Build confidence using the Glasgow Coma Scale to describe a patient's level of consciousness through eye, verbal and motor responses.

Key principle: a GCS score is more useful when you know how it was produced. Record the individual eye, verbal and motor components as well as the total score.
The basics

What is the Glasgow Coma Scale?

The Glasgow Coma Scale, commonly shortened to GCS, provides a structured way of assessing and communicating a patient's level of consciousness. It examines three responses.

E
Eye response

Maximum 4

Assesses whether the patient's eyes open spontaneously or in response to stimulation.

V
Verbal response

Maximum 5

Assesses the quality of the patient's verbal response and orientation.

M
Motor response

Maximum 6

Assesses the patient's best observed motor response.

Maximum total score = 15.
The minimum total score is 3. However, the total alone does not explain which component has changed.
Eye response

Eye opening β€” E

Eye opening is scored from 1 to 4 according to the patient's best observed response.

Score Response What it means
E4 Spontaneous The patient's eyes are open without stimulation.
E3 To sound Eyes open in response to an appropriate verbal or sound stimulus.
E2 To pressure Eyes open only following an appropriate pressure stimulus.
E1 None No eye opening response is observed.
Use the terminology and assessment technique taught by your university, placement area and local neurological observation policy. Appropriate stimulation should only be used within your competence and local guidance.
Verbal response

Verbal response β€” V

Score Response What you may observe
V5 Orientated The patient responds appropriately and is orientated.
V4 Confused The patient speaks but shows confusion or disorientation.
V3 Words Recognisable words are produced but conversation is not appropriate.
V2 Sounds Sounds are produced but recognisable words are absent.
V1 None No verbal response is observed.
Consider barriers to assessment. Language differences, hearing impairment, intubation, facial injury or other factors may affect the ability to assess verbal response normally. Document these limitations clearly rather than inventing a score.
Motor response

Motor response β€” M

The motor component ranges from 1 to 6 and records the patient's best motor response.

Score Response General interpretation
M6 Obeys commands The patient appropriately performs a requested movement.
M5 Localising The patient purposefully moves towards the source of an appropriate stimulus.
M4 Normal flexion / withdrawal The patient withdraws from an appropriate stimulus.
M3 Abnormal flexion An abnormal flexion response is observed.
M2 Extension An abnormal extension response is observed.
M1 None No motor response is observed.
Assessment of responses to pressure requires correct technique. Student nurses should follow local policy and supervision and should never improvise painful stimuli.
Putting it together

How is the total GCS calculated?

Add the eye, verbal and motor component scores together.

Example

A patient opens their eyes spontaneously: E4.

They are confused during conversation: V4.

They obey a request to move their arm: M6.

Their total is therefore: GCS 14 = E4 V4 M6.

Prefer: β€œGCS 14 β€” E4 V4 M6.”
This communicates much more information than simply saying β€œthe GCS is 14”.
Clinical reasoning

The trend may matter more than one score

A change from a patient's previous neurological state may be more clinically important than interpreting a single number in isolation.

Earlier

GCS 15

The patient is fully alert with normal eye, verbal and motor responses.

Later

GCS 13

A reduction from the previous assessment represents neurological deterioration that requires explanation and appropriate escalation.

Question

What changed?

Identify whether eye, verbal or motor response has changed and communicate that information.

Never focus only on the total. A falling motor response, for example, may be particularly important even before you calculate the final score.
Assessment

GCS is part of a wider neurological assessment

GCS should not replace observation of the patient's overall neurological and physiological condition.

Pupils

Observe pupil findings

Assess pupils according to local neurological observation procedures.

Movement

Look for asymmetry

New weakness or unequal movement may provide important additional information.

Physiology

Use ABCDE

Airway, breathing and circulation must still be assessed in a deteriorating patient.

  • Compare findings with the patient's neurological baseline.
  • Assess pupils where appropriate.
  • Look for new limb weakness or asymmetry.
  • Observe speech and behaviour.
  • Check blood glucose according to local practice.
  • Review physiological observations and NEWS2 where appropriate.
  • Repeat assessment when the clinical condition changes.
ABCDE

Reduced GCS can affect more than β€œD”

A

Airway

Reduced consciousness may compromise the patient's ability to maintain or protect their airway.

B

Breathing

Assess respiratory rate, pattern, oxygen saturation and effectiveness of breathing.

C

Circulation

Assess pulse, blood pressure and perfusion while considering potential causes of deterioration.

D

Disability

Assess GCS or the locally appropriate consciousness assessment, pupils, neurological findings and blood glucose.

Clinical scenario

Recognising a neurological trend

Example

A patient admitted following a head injury was previously documented as GCS 15 β€” E4 V5 M6.

During your next assessment they open their eyes only when spoken to, appear confused, but continue to obey commands.

The findings are now E3 V4 M6 = GCS 13.

The key issue is not simply the number 13. The patient's neurological state has deteriorated from their previous assessment.

You immediately communicate the change and obtain appropriate clinical review while continuing an ABCDE assessment.

Escalation

Changes that should concern you

  • A fall from the patient's previous GCS.
  • Increasing difficulty waking the patient.
  • New confusion or reduced verbal response.
  • A worsening motor response.
  • New pupil abnormalities alongside altered consciousness.
  • New focal neurological abnormalities.
  • Seizure activity with persistent reduced consciousness.
  • Reduced consciousness with airway or breathing concerns.
  • Any rapidly progressing neurological deterioration.
Follow local escalation protocols. Do not wait for the GCS to reach a particular number before escalating a patient whose neurological condition is clearly deteriorating.
Communication

Communicate the components and the change

Example escalation

β€œI'm concerned about Mr Jones. His GCS was 15 at 14:00 and is now 13. His eye response has changed from E4 to E3 and his verbal response from V5 to V4. His motor response remains M6.”

This is more clinically useful than simply reporting β€œhis GCS is 13”.

Common mistakes

GCS errors to avoid

  • Recording only the total score.
  • Failing to compare the score with previous assessments.
  • Using inappropriate stimulation techniques.
  • Ignoring factors that make a component untestable.
  • Assuming a relatively high total means deterioration is unimportant.
  • Looking at GCS without assessing airway, breathing and circulation.
  • Failing to escalate a falling neurological trend.
Clinical Confidence Routine

Observe β†’ score β†’ compare β†’ escalate

Observe & score

E + V + M

Assess and document eye, verbal and motor responses according to your training and local policy.

Compare

Look for change

Compare the individual components with the patient's previous neurological assessment.

Communicate & escalate

Report deterioration

Communicate the component scores, total score and neurological trend clearly.

Educational resource: this NurseNet guide supports student learning and does not replace formal GCS training, individual neurological assessment, NEWS2 or ABCDE, local neurological observation policies, emergency procedures, clinical supervision or professional judgement.
Continue Neurological Clinical Confidence

Build confidence recognising neurological change

Structured neurological observations become more useful when you can recognise trends, explain exactly what has changed and communicate deterioration clearly.

Explore Clinical Confidence β†’