Understanding Glasgow Coma Scale for Student Nurses
Build confidence using the Glasgow Coma Scale to describe a patient's level of consciousness through eye, verbal and motor responses.
What is the Glasgow Coma Scale?
The Glasgow Coma Scale, commonly shortened to GCS, provides a structured way of assessing and communicating a patient's level of consciousness. It examines three responses.
Maximum 4
Assesses whether the patient's eyes open spontaneously or in response to stimulation.
Maximum 5
Assesses the quality of the patient's verbal response and orientation.
Maximum 6
Assesses the patient's best observed motor response.
The minimum total score is 3. However, the total alone does not explain which component has changed.
Eye opening β E
Eye opening is scored from 1 to 4 according to the patient's best observed response.
| Score | Response | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| E4 | Spontaneous | The patient's eyes are open without stimulation. |
| E3 | To sound | Eyes open in response to an appropriate verbal or sound stimulus. |
| E2 | To pressure | Eyes open only following an appropriate pressure stimulus. |
| E1 | None | No eye opening response is observed. |
Verbal response β V
| Score | Response | What you may observe |
|---|---|---|
| V5 | Orientated | The patient responds appropriately and is orientated. |
| V4 | Confused | The patient speaks but shows confusion or disorientation. |
| V3 | Words | Recognisable words are produced but conversation is not appropriate. |
| V2 | Sounds | Sounds are produced but recognisable words are absent. |
| V1 | None | No verbal response is observed. |
Motor response β M
The motor component ranges from 1 to 6 and records the patient's best motor response.
| Score | Response | General interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| M6 | Obeys commands | The patient appropriately performs a requested movement. |
| M5 | Localising | The patient purposefully moves towards the source of an appropriate stimulus. |
| M4 | Normal flexion / withdrawal | The patient withdraws from an appropriate stimulus. |
| M3 | Abnormal flexion | An abnormal flexion response is observed. |
| M2 | Extension | An abnormal extension response is observed. |
| M1 | None | No motor response is observed. |
How is the total GCS calculated?
Add the eye, verbal and motor component scores together.
Example
A patient opens their eyes spontaneously: E4.
They are confused during conversation: V4.
They obey a request to move their arm: M6.
Their total is therefore: GCS 14 = E4 V4 M6.
This communicates much more information than simply saying βthe GCS is 14β.
The trend may matter more than one score
A change from a patient's previous neurological state may be more clinically important than interpreting a single number in isolation.
GCS 15
The patient is fully alert with normal eye, verbal and motor responses.
GCS 13
A reduction from the previous assessment represents neurological deterioration that requires explanation and appropriate escalation.
What changed?
Identify whether eye, verbal or motor response has changed and communicate that information.
GCS is part of a wider neurological assessment
GCS should not replace observation of the patient's overall neurological and physiological condition.
Observe pupil findings
Assess pupils according to local neurological observation procedures.
Look for asymmetry
New weakness or unequal movement may provide important additional information.
Use ABCDE
Airway, breathing and circulation must still be assessed in a deteriorating patient.
- Compare findings with the patient's neurological baseline.
- Assess pupils where appropriate.
- Look for new limb weakness or asymmetry.
- Observe speech and behaviour.
- Check blood glucose according to local practice.
- Review physiological observations and NEWS2 where appropriate.
- Repeat assessment when the clinical condition changes.
Reduced GCS can affect more than βDβ
Airway
Reduced consciousness may compromise the patient's ability to maintain or protect their airway.
Breathing
Assess respiratory rate, pattern, oxygen saturation and effectiveness of breathing.
Circulation
Assess pulse, blood pressure and perfusion while considering potential causes of deterioration.
Disability
Assess GCS or the locally appropriate consciousness assessment, pupils, neurological findings and blood glucose.
Recognising a neurological trend
Example
A patient admitted following a head injury was previously documented as GCS 15 β E4 V5 M6.
During your next assessment they open their eyes only when spoken to, appear confused, but continue to obey commands.
The findings are now E3 V4 M6 = GCS 13.
The key issue is not simply the number 13. The patient's neurological state has deteriorated from their previous assessment.
You immediately communicate the change and obtain appropriate clinical review while continuing an ABCDE assessment.
Changes that should concern you
- A fall from the patient's previous GCS.
- Increasing difficulty waking the patient.
- New confusion or reduced verbal response.
- A worsening motor response.
- New pupil abnormalities alongside altered consciousness.
- New focal neurological abnormalities.
- Seizure activity with persistent reduced consciousness.
- Reduced consciousness with airway or breathing concerns.
- Any rapidly progressing neurological deterioration.
Communicate the components and the change
Example escalation
βI'm concerned about Mr Jones. His GCS was 15 at 14:00 and is now 13. His eye response has changed from E4 to E3 and his verbal response from V5 to V4. His motor response remains M6.β
This is more clinically useful than simply reporting βhis GCS is 13β.
GCS errors to avoid
- Recording only the total score.
- Failing to compare the score with previous assessments.
- Using inappropriate stimulation techniques.
- Ignoring factors that make a component untestable.
- Assuming a relatively high total means deterioration is unimportant.
- Looking at GCS without assessing airway, breathing and circulation.
- Failing to escalate a falling neurological trend.
Observe β score β compare β escalate
E + V + M
Assess and document eye, verbal and motor responses according to your training and local policy.
Look for change
Compare the individual components with the patient's previous neurological assessment.
Report deterioration
Communicate the component scores, total score and neurological trend clearly.
Build confidence recognising neurological change
Structured neurological observations become more useful when you can recognise trends, explain exactly what has changed and communicate deterioration clearly.
Explore Clinical Confidence β