Simple
Three broad questions make the structure easy to remember.
Learn how to use Driscoll's What? So What? Now What? framework to structure nursing reflection, move beyond description and turn placement experiences into meaningful learning and future action.
Driscoll's reflective framework organises reflection around three broad questions: What? So What? and Now What?
The model is simpler than frameworks with multiple stages, but it still encourages you to move through the key parts of reflective thinking: identifying the experience, exploring its meaning and deciding how the learning will influence future action.
For nursing students, the three-question structure can be useful when you want a clear framework without splitting the reflection into many separate headings.
Three broad questions make the structure easy to remember.
Each question can contain several layers of reflective thinking.
The model ends by asking how learning will shape what happens next.
Some nursing assignments specify a particular reflective framework, while others allow you to choose. Always follow your module guidance, assessment brief and marking criteria first.
If Driscoll is permitted, its broad questions can help you organise your thinking without forcing every part of the experience into a separate stage.
Each question has a different purpose. The strength of the model comes from how deeply you explore each stage rather than simply answering the three questions in a few sentences.
Explain what happened, who was involved, your role and the key issue. Keep the description focused so that you leave enough space for the deeper reflective thinking that follows.
This is usually the most analytical part of the reflection. Consider what you were thinking and feeling, what went well or poorly, why the situation was significant and what knowledge helps you understand it.
Decide how your learning will influence future behaviour, knowledge or development. Be specific about what you will practise, revise, discuss, seek feedback on or approach differently.
Driscoll's framework is simple, but the middle question carries much of the analytical work.
What happened? What was your role? What was the significant event?
Why did it matter? What influenced the outcome? What did you learn?
What will you change, practise, learn or do differently next time?
Imagine that during placement you receive feedback that your patient handover contains the necessary information but is difficult to follow because the information is not presented in a clear order.
I gave a patient handover to my supervisor. I included the information I believed was important, but afterwards my supervisor explained that the handover was difficult to follow because the information was not organised clearly.
I had focused mainly on remembering the facts and assumed that including all the relevant information meant the handover was effective. The feedback helped me recognise that communication also depends on how clearly information is structured for the listener.
I realised that unclear organisation can make important information harder to identify, even when the content itself is accurate.
Before future handovers, I will organise the key information in a clear sequence and practise using a structured communication framework. I will also ask my supervisor for specific feedback on whether my handovers become easier to follow.
Use these as prompts to develop your own thinking rather than as a fixed template to copy.
“The experience I am reflecting on involved…”
“The main issue during the situation was…”
“My role within the experience was…”
“This was significant because…”
“Looking back, I can see that…”
“One factor that influenced the situation was…”
“If a similar situation occurred again, I would…”
“To develop this further, I will…”
“The next step in my learning is…”
If your assignment requires references, evidence is often most useful within the “So What?” stage because this is where you analyse the meaning of the experience.
You may use appropriate literature, theory, nursing knowledge or professional guidance to help explain why something happened or why the learning is important.
Driscoll uses three broad questions, while Gibbs breaks reflection into six separate stages.
Driscoll can feel more concise and flexible. Gibbs may provide more scaffolding for students who prefer detailed prompts.
Neither framework is automatically better. Your assignment requirements and the depth of your reflection matter more than the number of headings.
See the differences in structure and how the same nursing experience can be organised using either framework.
Compare Gibbs vs Driscoll →Too much description leaves too little space for analysis.
The middle stage should explore significance, meaning and learning.
Consider why your response mattered and how it influenced the situation.
“I will improve” is weaker than identifying a specific action.
Strong reflective writing should feel like connected thinking rather than a questionnaire.
Learn the six stages of Gibbs and see how the model can be applied to nursing reflection.
Explore Gibbs Reflective Cycle →See how common student-nurse experiences can be turned into meaningful reflective learning.
See the reflective examples →Follow a practical process from choosing an experience through to analysis and action planning.
Read the nursing reflection guide →Explore more NurseNet resources for reflective writing, academic study, placement, nursing numeracy, drug calculations and professional development.
Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires.