Credible
The source has a clear and trustworthy origin.
Learn how to find, judge and use credible evidence for nursing assignments — including academic journals, professional guidance, healthcare organisations and practical checks for source quality.
A reliable source is not simply one that looks professional or appears near the top of a search result. It should be appropriate for the academic question you are answering and produced using trustworthy evidence or recognised professional expertise.
Nursing assignments often require a mixture of peer-reviewed research, academic literature and relevant professional or clinical guidance.
The source has a clear and trustworthy origin.
It contributes directly to the question you are answering.
The type and strength of evidence match the claim you want to make.
General web searching can be useful for locating organisations, guidance or identifying useful keywords, but search ranking is not a measure of academic quality.
Before using a source in assessed work, check who produced it, why it was produced, what evidence supports it and whether it is appropriate for your assignment.
University library systems often provide access to journal databases, ebooks and research that may otherwise sit behind publisher paywalls.
Databases allow you to search research using combinations of keywords, subject headings, dates and other filters.
Professional regulators, national healthcare organisations and evidence-based guideline producers can provide important standards, recommendations and professional context.
If a strong article discusses evidence relevant to your assignment, its reference list may help you identify important earlier research.
Nursing assignments often use several types of evidence. The strongest source depends partly on the question being asked.
Useful for research findings, evidence and academic debate.
Useful for professional expectations, recommendations and practice context.
Useful for established concepts, theory and background understanding.
Useful for understanding what a wider body of research collectively suggests.
Searching an entire essay title word for word may produce poor results. Instead, identify the main concepts and think of alternative terms for each.
communication · handover · information sharing
nurse · nursing · registered nurse
patient safety · error · adverse event
Think of different words researchers might use for the same concept.
Widen the search when your original terms are too specific.
Add context when your search returns too many unrelated results.
Look at keywords used by authors of highly relevant research.
Look for recognised researchers, academic publishers or authoritative organisations.
Educational, professional, commercial and promotional sources may have very different aims.
Reliable academic claims should be supported by transparent evidence rather than assertion alone.
Strong evidence that does not relate closely to your assignment may still be of limited use.
Consider whether developments in policy, evidence or clinical practice may have changed since publication.
Identify weaknesses, conflicts of interest, methodological problems or limitations in applicability.
Peer review is an important quality-control process in academic publishing, but it does not make every published study equally strong.
Research can still have methodological limitations, small samples, bias or limited relevance to your question. Peer-reviewed evidence should still be critically appraised.
Depending on the assignment, you may need evidence showing professional expectations, clinical recommendations or current healthcare guidance.
Useful where your discussion involves professional responsibilities, conduct or nursing standards.
Useful for clinical recommendations and evidence-based healthcare guidance.
Useful for appropriate healthcare policy, service or patient-information contexts.
But authorship, evidence and editorial standards can vary enormously.
Information may be shaped partly by a product or service being sold.
Popularity and confidence of presentation do not establish reliability.
A professional-looking webpage can still lack transparent evidence or authority.
Use appropriate professional guidance to establish why communication matters within nursing practice.
Find journal literature investigating communication, handover, patient safety or related outcomes.
Compare findings and consider whether differences in study design, settings or populations affect the conclusions.
Use the evidence to answer your assignment question rather than simply listing what each source says.
Ranking does not tell you whether the source is academically strong.
Good academic discussion may need evidence representing different findings or perspectives.
Older sources may no longer reflect current standards or healthcare recommendations.
Even reputable organisations should be used for the type of information they are suited to provide.
A wider evidence base often allows stronger comparison and discussion.
Published research still needs critical appraisal.
Every source should have a clear purpose within your argument.
A quick quality check can save you from building an argument around evidence that is weak, outdated or irrelevant.
I know who produced the source.
The source is relevant to my exact question.
I understand what evidence supports its claims.
I have considered whether it is current enough.
I know its important limitations.
I can explain why I am using it in my assignment.
Learn how to judge methods, findings, limitations and relevance.
Explore critical appraisal →Learn how to compare and evaluate evidence once you have found it.
Explore critical writing →Follow the complete nursing essay process from planning to submission.
Read the nursing essay guide →Explore more NurseNet resources for nursing assignments, reflective writing, placement, nursing numeracy and drug calculations.
Get started today before this once in a lifetime opportunity expires.